via Amateur Radio Daily: M17 Activity Day
![](../themes/icons/grey.gif)
TO: EMECT | ||
FROM: AE5MI | ||
SUBJ: Field Day Winlink Exercises | ||
DATE: 2024-06-22 | ||
TIME: 0711L | ||
MESSAGE: | ||
EmComm Training Organization Field Day Two Part Winlink Exercises Part One due June 22nd 18:00 UTC – June 23rd 20:59 UTC Part Two due June 25th 00:00 UTC – June 28th 07:59 UTC https://emcomm-training.org/06-22-24%20Field%20Day%20Two%20Part%20Exercise.docx.pdf |
FT8 has been a revolution. The technology has made DXing really easy. Or has it? I continue to be amazed at how much difficulty people have working DXpeditions on FT8.
Last year, there were DXpeditions to Bouvet (3Y0J), Crozet (FT8WW) and Sable Islands (CY0S). The most recent DXpedition to Glorioso Islands (FT4GL) has brought it all back to me.
Let's start off with a few observations on people trying to work these DXpeditions:
One of the great things about amateur radio is that there are so many different modes to explore and avenues to pursue. It is an amazingly diverse technical hobby. There is something for everyone, and FT8 has become that something for many amateur operators, much to the chagrin of a few curdmudgeons.
Without giving air to the critics, I wanted to share why I like to use FT8 (and FT4).
In February 2023 I was diagnosed with cancer. After two surgeries and six weeks of radiation treatment, I am currently cancer free. But during the diagnosis and treatment time, I needed a distraction – something that was fun, but intellectually stimulating. One can only play so many word games on their phone. I had cut back on work and was spending a lot of time at home to recover. I had never used WSJT-X before then, but decided to get my Xiegu X6100 on the air and try these new-to-me digital modes. So I set up the radio with an EFHW (End Fed Half Wave) and got it configured to do FT8. This also forced me to figure out a logging solution (I ended up using N3FJP ACLog on Windows, along with Logbook of the World, QRZ logbook, eQSL, etc). I also set it up so that I could remotely access the PC interfaced with the radio, and use my Android tablet while I was stuck in bed. I’ve also set up FT8 on my Android devices using the FT8CN app, which is pretty fun to use. This whole thing proved to be great fun to set up, tune, and refine. And it was fun to operate while I was recovering. I made hundreds of contacts and learned a lot about propagation and my antennas during this time. Which brings me to the second reason I love FT8.
Once I was up and about more, and had more time, I began to experiment with different antenna solutions. I have a small backyard with no tall trees, and can’t really erect a permanent antenna. So I bought a couple of different telescoping poles (this one and this one). I started playing with different setups for the EFHW (sloper, inverted L, vertical). A great way to assess and compare the performance of each configuration was to change it, then call CQ on FT8 on a band of interest, and examine the spots from PSKreporter. It is really amazing how much this helps understand an antenna’s performance. I spent a lot of time doing this with the EFHW, a G5RV, and some dipoles. I now have a very good idea of how each of my antenna setups will perform on a given band, within ionospheric conditions and constraints, of course. This has really helped me to understand practical RF propagation and my available antenna solutions.
The third reason I love FT8 is that it is like theraputic operating. And this realization came to me while recovering from surgery or when I was too tired from radiation treatment to do anything else. One can be very casual or very concentrated when operating FT8. But seeing those grid squares fill in and then get confirmed (I use GridTracker) is very satisfying. And I don’t mean satisfying from a contest standpoint (at least not for me), but from a sort of puzzle-solving standpoint. It’s pretty cool to me to see a real-time map of all the contacts you have made on a mode by band.
I operate a lot of other HF modes as well (Olivia, PSK, VarAC, JS8Call, packet, and even SSB!) but I still like FT8 and FT4. At the end of the day, it is a hobby and it is all about having fun. Do what you enjoy and strive to be good at it. What do you like about operating FT8?
Like many amateur operators, I have far too many handie talkies (HTs). I’ve cycled through many, and sold or given away many that I was done with. Some of those I wish I hadn’t sold (like the Kenwood TH-D74), but others I was glad to be rid of. I thought I would take a few paragraphs to talk about what I use day to day, and what I like and don’t like about these radios. I should note that I won’t discuss the HTs that I use in wildland fire communications as that is an entirely different purpose and topic.
On a regular basis and in addition to analog FM, I use DMR and Yaesu C4FM. To a lesser extent, I use P25 on amateur networks. Rarely do I ever use D-STAR any more, and then only via DVswitch and the mobile app on the phone.
I like using DMR. I’ve always liked the networks (specifically Brandmeister) and the architecture. I know, the digital audio is totally different than the richness of analog, but it’s still fun. And DMR was where I really learned about bridging and how I got into XLX reflectors.
For DMR, I mainly use the Anytone 878UV Plus II. I also use a Radioddity GD77 with the OpenGD77 firmware, and a Motorola XPR7550e. Of these three, I think the 878 is probably the best everyday choice. Yes, the 878 has its weird quirks, and the CPS (Customer Programming Software) is pretty bad, but the radio is fairly solid and easy to operate. And it sounds very good, both on receive and transmit. I also like the form factor and feel in the hand when operating. The OpenGD77 firmware is probably the most ham-friendly DMR firmware in existence, and is a pleasure to operate. But the hardware (Radioddity GD77) isn’t nearly as nice as the Anytone. I do like this radio as well, and keep one in the shed and use it while I’m out working in the yard. These radios as so inexpensive that you can have a couple and not worry about beating them up. In addition, both the 878 and the GD77 work very well with the Mobilinkd TNC4 for packet.
I don’t use the Motorola XPR7550e as much. It is a good solid radio, but is lacking a lot of the ham friendly features (like direct TG entry and persistence). I use it mostly on the Rocky Mountain Ham Radio region-wide DMR network where I am usually parked on one repeater/TG (Talkgroup) or roaming on a single TG.
For Yaesu C4FM (commonly referred to as “Fusion”), I use the FT-5DR. I also have an older FT-2DR, but it is relegated to my PDN (Personal Digital Node). The FT-5DR is a decent radio, and has a lot of APRS features. But to me, it feels pretty cheap. Indeed, mine has develoepd the dreaded case crack (or “mold line” as Yaesu likes to call it). It also goes through batteries very quickly. I always carry 2 extra batteries for this radio. I think my main gripes about this radio are the audio quality and the form factor. It does not sound very good, probably owing to the tiny size and small speaker. And it feels uncomfortable to hold an operate. I mostly use Yaesu C4FM because it is becoming more and more popular in our area, but I will admit that I am a bit of a reluctant user.
In my opinion, the Kenwood TH-D74 was the best APRS HT that I have ever owned. I should not have sold that. Kenwood’s APRS implementation and UI are much better than Yaesu’s, and the receiver in the Kenwood radios is much, much better than the Yaesu. I just wish Kenwood hadn’t gone with D-STAR as their digital mode of choice.
Finally, I use P25 a bit over a hotspot on amateur radio. For that I use a UHF Motorola XTS2500. I said I wouldn’t talk about wildland fire radios in this post, but I did it anyway. I also use this radio on fires, as it is one of the NIFC (National Interagency Fire Center) approved radios. This is a very solid older radio with great audio. The CPS is a real bear to deal with (read: it is horrible and not ham friendly), but the radio is awesome. On fires, I use it with a very large AA batttery clamshell that holds 12 batteries, but around the house I use an old rechargeable battery.
Anyway, as you can see I like HTs Maybe in a future post I will discuss some others, and talk about what we use in wildland fire.
DXer vs. TXTer. They are not the same. Dom, T32TT calling N0UN on "Phone" from East Kiribati: (video). Guess this picture says it all: Lazy is, as lazy does.
The post DXer vs. TXTer first appeared on N0UN.net.TXTpeditions (Formerly DXpeditions): Current TXTpeditions as of this Blog Post: T22T - 100,034 Q's: .5% CW, 1% SSB, 98.5% FT. ZD9W - 6,518 Q's: 0% CW, 0% SSB, 100% FT.
The post TXTpeditions (Formerly DXpeditions) first appeared on N0UN.net.February 14, 2024, will be etched in the memories of a generation of Oregon residents for more than Romance. On that date Mount Doom, a little known peak in the
The post February 14, 2024 first appeared on N0UN.net.
September 1985, I purchased a Kenwood TS-430S and became more active in amateur radio. In the apartment where I was living, I snuck wires out of a second floor window and began to make contacts.
In October, I got the notion to try some Radio Teletype (RTTY). I built a demodulator using a circuit I've forgotten. Perhaps it used a couple of NE567 chips. Having a demodulator, I needed to translate the five-level Baudot characters into ASCII that I could display on the terminal.
(I purchased a Wyse 85 VT-220 emulator terminal in August of 1985, so I was no longer constrained by the 64x16 screen and 1200 bps limitations of the CT-64)
I wrote a program for Flex09 to decode 45 Baud RTTY by bit-banging a PIA pin. I couldn't use the MC6850 ACIA, because it does not support 5 bit characters.
A delay loop established character timing:
Each pass through the loop consumes 8 clock cycles. With the right value loaded in X, fairly precise timings could be accomplished. A value close to 250 would be 1 ms on a 2 MHz machine. By calling this loop repeatedly, timings of 11 and 22 ms are measured.
I connected the demodulator output to PIA Port B, pin 0. The program looks at this pin, waiting for a zero. Finding one, it calls the delay loop for 1 ms and checks again. If the pin is still zero, it waits 10 ms and checks Port B pin 0. A continued zero at this point indicates a start bit. The 11 ms total delay places us right in the middle of the start bit.
The next sequence waits 22 ms and then samples of value of Port B, pin 0. It does this five times. These samples are shifted into a byte value, which used to look up an ASCII character in one of two tables -- one for letters, and one for figures -- according to the shift mode. This character is then sent to the terminal, and we go back to waiting for a start bit.
The resulting program is about 300 bytes long. Despite the simplicity, I had little success decoding RTTY signals.
In hindsight, there are several reasons for this.
At some point, I distinctly copied "RY RY RY RY RY RY RY" from someone, but not much else. Later, I figured out this meant my program, at least, was working.
In November 1986, I decided to use serial chip that could do five-level Baudot. The MC6850 only allows 7 and 8 bit characters, so I needed a different chip. The NS8250 could do 5, 6, 7 and 8 bit characters, and sports a programmable bit rate generator for all the common RTTY rates. Hence, I added an NS8250 UART to the baud-rate generator board.
Funny, though -- I never wrote software to use the NS8250. In February 1989, I removed the NS8250 and its associated circuitry.
I didn't become active in RTTY on the air until 2005, using Cocoamodem.
We’ve been having a lot of fun with the Greencube (IO-117) satellite, so I decided to put together a portable ground station for activating grid squares. I wanted a station that –
We already have a solar-battery power system that we build for portable operation with a 100w transceiver as well as an IC-9700 transceiver that we use as part of our transportable satellite ground station. We also have Windows and Mac laptop computers that we can use as part of our Greencube (IO-117) portable ground station. With these components in mind, here are the hardware components that we are using as part of our Greencube portable station –
We are using the following software for our portable Greencube (IO-117) ground station:
We also purchased a case (Pelican Air 1555) to package the transceiver and accessories.
We choose the M2 Antenna Systems 440-11X Antenna for our portable ground station. This antenna has more than adequate gain for use with Greencube, and its lightweight rear-mounted design makes it ideal for use with our heavy-duty video camera tripod.
The antenna is attached to the tripod using a Camera Tripod Ball Mount, a Handlebar Ball Mount Clamp, and a Double Socket Ball Arm. The Handlebar Clamp grips that antenna’s rear extension and allows the antenna to be easily rotated to align its polarity with Greencube’s antenna during a pass. A short section of water pipe with a cap, hook, and a 1,000-gram weight provides a counterweight to balance the antenna on the tripod.
A Magnetic Digital Angle Guage is used to adjust the elevation angle of the antenna.
A coax-powered LNA from Advanced Receiver Research (an available alternative is the SSB Electronic SP 70 preamp) is attached to one of the legs of the tripod and is connected to the antenna with a short LMR-240uF coax cable. a 20′ length of LMR-400uF coax connects the antenna system to the transceiver. N-connectors are used throughout the feedline system.
Our setup uses an Icom IC-9700 transceiver and two computers. The IC-9700 transceiver is connected to the Windows computer via the radio’s USB port and to the MacBook Air via a CI-V cable.
The Windows computer runs the following software programs to provide the client terminal, modem, and logging functions required to operate with Greencube –
The configuration of these programs is covered in more detail here.
The Windows laptop also runs the NMEATime application and uses a USB GPS Dongle to accurately determine the grid locator where we are operating from. The grid locator from NMEATime is used to configure MacDoppler to ensure accurate tracking information for aiming our antenna.
The MacBook Air laptop runs MacDoopler. MacDoppler is connected to the IC-9700 transceiver via a CI-V cable and controls the IC-9700’s uplink and downlink frequencies to provide Doppler correction. MacDoppler is also used to determine the azimuth and elevation of Greencube to enable manual pointing of our antenna.
Powering a 100-watt transceiver in a portable application during extended operating sessions can present a challenge. I also wanted a setup that was quiet as we often operate portable in public locations. For these reasons, I decided to put together a solar-battery setup that consists of the following components:
The solar panels are wired in series and provide about 34 Vdc in bright sunlight.
The MPPT Charge Controller automatically determines the best balance between cell voltage and current to provide maximum power transfer to charge the batteries. The batteries provide the extra power capacity needed when transmitting. The resulting power setup can sustain the full power operation of our portable station, even on cloud days.
The laptops run on their internal batteries and are changed via automotive lighter socket power adapters between operating sessions.
My initial tests of the portable station were done using the station to receive Telemetry from Greencube. This allowed me to learn to steer the antenna and adjust it for the best polarity during passes. The station had no trouble hearing and decoding Greencube’s telemetry transmission from horizon to horizon.
It was relatively easy to point the antenna based on the azimuth and elevation information from MacDoppler. I used a compass app on my iPhone to set the antenna’s azimuth heading and the Digital Angle Guage to set the antenna’s elevation. Pointing the antenna to within +/- 10 degrees of accuracy was adequate for reliable operation with Greencube.
I turned the speaker volume on the radio high enough so I could hear Greencube’s signal while adjusting the antenna polarity. Finding the polarity that caused Greencube’s signal to be weakest and then rotating the antenna 90 degrees from this point worked well.
I was able to make 15-20 contacts on each Greencube pass with our portable ground station. The RSSI graph in the Greencube terminal is a good indicator to determine when to adjust the antenna’s heading and polarity to track Greencube during a pass. It’s best to have a helper with one person making contacts and the other adjusting the antenna, but it’s possible for a single operator to do both jobs and still make many contacts during a pass.
I am quite pleased with the performance of our new portable ground station for Greencube (IO-117). Anita and I are planning a portable grid square activation trip for later in the fall to make use of the station.
This article is the fifth in a series that we are working on. You view the other articles via the links below. This is a work in progress, and we’ll be creating additional Greencube-related posts in the near future:
You can also read more about our Satellite Ground stations here.
Fred, AB1OC
The post Greencube (IO-117) – A Portable Station for Activating Grid Squares appeared first on Our HAM Station.