❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdaySolderSmoke Daily News

Woebot -- An AI-Based Therapy Bot for Us?

✇SolderSmoke Daily News
By: Bill Meara
8 April 2024 at 15:48

 
This was on 60 Minutes last night.  Of course it made me think of our many "Tales of Woe."  Perhaps this could be of use to us.   But I wonder how the bot would react to our typical problems: 

"I am feeling bad about myself becasue my RF amplifier keeps going into oscillation.  What should I do?"

"My opposite sideband suppression is inadequate because my filter skirts are too wide. What is your advice?" 

"My LC VFO drifts slightly and my SDR-using friends taunt me about this.  I feel dejected.  What should I do?"  

"The Raspberry Pi in my SDR rig is hallucinating and I can't find the needed wisdom files. Is there a support group for this?" 

"I have discovered spurs in the output of my transmitter.  They are 60 db down, but I still can't stop thinking about them.  What should I do?"

I can't help thinking that if Jean Shepherd had access to something like this, his Heising modulator trouble might not have spoiled his date with the girl from his school.  

What do you guys think about the Woebot?  

How to Feel Bad about Carrier Suppression (and How to Get Over It)

✇SolderSmoke Daily News
By: Bill Meara
26 March 2024 at 11:10

Version 2 of the 15-10 rig continues to give me trouble.  But I guess it is "good trouble" because I am learning from it. 

You see, after you build an SSB rig, one of the critical alignment steps is the placement of the carrier oscillator/BFO frequency in relation to the filter passband.  (The IMSAI Guy has a good video on this -- see above.)  You want to place this oscillator somewhere on the downward skirt of the passband curve.  This will add to the carrier suppression already done by your balanced modulator.  There will always be some carrier remaining from the balanced modulator -- putting the oscillator frequency on the downward skirt of the filter passband adds to the suppression the carrier remnant.  

But you can't overdo it.   If you place that carrier oscillator frequency too far down on the skirt, you will start to cutoff the low audio frequencies in your transmit and received signals.  You will notice that your once beautiful sounding receiver suddenly sounds tinny and high pitched.  Yuck. 

So you go back to the books and the websites.  You look at the passband promissed by the Dishal software you used to design the filter.  See below:  

Click on the image for a better view

Surely with a passband as nice as that one, you will be able to find the sweet spot where the carrier is suppressed and your audio remains pristine.  

But I couldn't do this with the 15-10 rig.  I was forced to compromise: I had to accept less than optimal carrier suppression for less than optimal low frequency passband coverage.  And here is why:
Click on the image for a better view

The curve above is a much more realistic picture of what my filter passband actually looks like (see NanoVNA picture below).  The curve above is from the AADE software.  I found out that the Dishal software DOES NOT factor in important things like Q or ESR.  Dishal treats all crystals as "loss-less radiators."  So when you get up to 25 MHz where Q is important, AADE and other programs will show you that your passband has become curved.  And you can see how this curvature makes it difficult to get the kind of carrier suppression and audio response we want.  

What my filter looked like in a Nano VNA
Click for a better view

Look, the rigs work OK.  The receivers sound good to me.  The carrier is so far down that no one can hear it.  I have to remind myself that we are using 'SSB-SC" -- suppressed carrier, not eliminated carrier.  I've worked a lot of DX with these rigs.  But still,  I would like to improve the situation.  It kind of bothers me.  Homebrewers will understand. 

I have been experimenting with different balanced modulators.  I started with the simple two diode, single transformer, singly balanced design from Farhan's BITX20.  It works fine.  But I think I get a bit better suppresson from a doubly balanced diode ring.  I may try an NE602 Gilbert Cell.   I may also try to build a higher Q 25 MHz filter using low-ESR surface mount crystals from Mouser.  Stay tuned.  

Thanks to W7ZOI, VU2ESE, WN2A, KA4KXX, KK4DAS, N6QW, W2AEW, and G3UUR for all the good advice and encouragement.  Please put any additional ideas in the comments below.  

Finishing up (?) Version 2 of my 15-10 Transceiver (Video) -- An Annoying Residual Carrier Problem

✇SolderSmoke Daily News
By: Bill Meara
15 March 2024 at 09:49

Front panel is on. RF PA is installed. Balanced Modulator problem fixed (?) Rig is on the air with about 3 watts, working lots of DX.

But there is an annoying amount of carrier that is still getting through. It is only about .5 watts with sidebands of 100 watts PEP, but it annoys me, and it makes the setting of the carrier frequency in relation to the filter passband very critical: If I set the carrier a bit too far from the passband I get improved carrier rejection (from the filter), but I also lose the lows in both received and transmitted signals -- the RX just doesn't sound as good. I see it in both of the 15-10 rigs (IF of 25 MHz). There is less of it in the 17-12 meter rig (IF of 21.4 MHZ), and none of it in the Mythbuster (75-20 meters) (IF of 5.2 MHz). I am now wondering if this might be a consequence of my using a very high (25 MHz) single conversion IF in the 15-10 rigs. What do you folks think?

From my log: March 7, 2024 PUT VERSION 2 of the 15-10 RIG ON THE AIR! 10S 1528 OK2RZ Jiri – said I was 57! 15S 1539 S52WW 58 Damian. 15S 1602 SP1NQH Stev said I am big signal! 10S S58N 1726Z 10S S58N 1726Z 10S S57S 1728Z 10S IK4GRO Lauro 1735Z 10S W0CJV 1825Z Ft. Collins Gary 10s 2000Zish KK7TV Gary in Randy. Asked what software/microcontroller I was using. 10S KJ5MFF 2015Zish a middle school in New Mexico. KI5MFF control op sent picture

 

❌
❌